|
Synergy,
value and respect:
how an M&A deal goes right
Client Profile:
EPIC
Advisors, DELIVERING WHAT TODAY'S 401(k)
WORK FORCE WANTS
EPIC has gained a national reputation as a leader in providing custom 401(k)
retirement plan programs to employers and financial institutions. The firm
specializes in participant-directed plans, primarily using daily valuation
recordkeeping. EPIC serves as recordkeeper for more than 720 retirement plans,
and supports individual employer-sponsored plans and institutional partners
in some 29 states.
Founded in 1993 and headquartered in downtown Rochester,
New York, EPIC is now led by Robert F. Judd, President, and
James M. Genthner, Executive Vice President.
Download a PDF version of this case study to read at your convenience
EPIC's opportunity:
It's time to grow
Some eleven years after its establishment, EPIC found itself
in the enviable position of gready to grow." Company leaders
had been approached over the years by interested buyers,
but now the timing—from a personal as well as marketplace
perspective—seemed right.
"EFP Group had been our accountants for a number of
years, for day-to-day accounting and tax returns, but also
had helped us with our SAS 70 process," explains EPIC president
Bob Judd. "When Lou Camarella indicated that EFP had merger
and acquisition functionality in-house, it seemed like a
good solution to leverage the relationship we already had."
Camarella, a partner at EFP Group, heads the Valuation,
Litigation & Forensic Services Group. He and Kurt Litzelfelner,
a senior valuation analyst in the group with previous M&A
experience, had a long history with Judd, Genthner and the
other owners of EPIC. "There were no surprises for us, either
on the books at EPIC, or in the intentions of the leadership,"
Camarella says. "We knew exactly what they were trying to
achieve."
Setting
the stage: partnerships that advance the client's interest
Business owners looking for a merger, sale or acquisition
face a number of options. They can manage the process themselves,
fielding phone calls, putting out feelers. They can rely
on an attorney to help them manage the risk. They can turn
to their accountant, who may or may not have experience in
M&A work. They can seek out the services of an investment
banker.
"We believe," says EFP's Litzelfelner, "that
the optimum solution is to combine the skills and knowledge
of an accounting firm that has M&A expertise with the
specialized advantages of an investment banking firm. Clients
get the full range of strategic and tactical help they need."
Judd concurs. "One of the advantages of having the accounting
firm tie in is, they know you already. They have a familiarity
with who you are as well as the financial background of the
company. But also, this kind of deal is really a mix of the
investment banking side and the presentation of financials.
Your accountants are going to be involved one way or the
other so to combine the two parties is a solid benefit."
For the EPIC sale, EFP Group brought in a regional investment
banking firm. The firm serves middle-market companies who,
although they have the same demanding needs of larger companies,
may find it difficult to access
a larger investment banking firm.
"We found all of the people involved to be just great,"
says Judd.
A systematic process: yields the best price, best
terms, best buyer
"There are different types of sales," explains
EFP's Camarella, "and it's critical to choose the best
model for each client. In EPIC's case, we chose a limited or
targeted auction, where we invited bids from a select group
of candidates. This approach allowed EPIC to maintain a high
level of confidentiality while still attracting a significant
level of competition."
The next step, says Litzelfelner, is to put a systematic
process into place. "There are a number of essential phases,"
he says, "running from initial due diligence and valuation
all the way to the closing process. Team members from EFP
Group and the investment banking firm prepare an offering
memorandum that details the case for the sale, research and
recommend potential buyers, obtain indications of interest
and letters of intent, prepare a 'data room' where interested
parties can conduct due diligence, negotiate a definitive
purchase agreement, and coordinate legal, accounting and
other issues leading up to the closing."
"The average person," says Judd, "would be
clueless about what goes into this. What are the elements
that make a good deal or a bad deal? You need to focus on
the legal representations and warranties in addition to the
financial aspects. Just defining what is being sold and what
is not is a process in itself. And the presentation, you
can't forget that—the written offer book, the discussion.
This process worked. It certainly allows you to keep the
business going during the M&A timeframe. That's critical,
when it's time to close you want a company worth at least
as much as when you started the process. You have to remember
it's not going to happen overnight. Ours took six months,
and that was fast."
Result: happy parties on both sides of the table
That systematic process generally leads to more interest
than would be uncovered otherwise. "Although we can never
guarantee how the relationship will unfold, we bring clients
choices, "Camarella says. "They can weigh the synergies
and advantages—one buyer might bring you more products, another
might offer more money but require you to close your office
or terminate employees, another might require relocation,
another might offer a ready sales force and marketing support,
and still another might offer a good cultural fit."
"We came to a point where we had four interested parties,"
says Judd. "It became a bit of a horse race, which is of
course what you want. This is where the price went up substantially,
and the terms improved. Once you have everyone arriving at
similar numbers, then the advantage goes to employees, and
to clients."
The winning bid came from NBT Bancorp of Norwich, New York.
"We were able to get what we wanted with the shortest
time and best terms and, maybe most importantly in this case,
we were able to retain 100 percent of our employees," says
Judd. "There was no reduction in our staff. And we continue
to do business as EPIC Advisors. This was the best possible
deal for our clients."
What counts: enhancing reputations and relationships
While it was important for EPIC to get the best possible
deal, it was also critical to maintain a fair, respectful
process.
"These were people," Judd says of the potential
buyers,
"who we were going to work with or compete against in
the future. We were not interested in creating enemies. I
think you have to be very cautious about losing a sense of
fairness, and that comes from communicating exactly what
the process is and following it. If people feel they're
being played, it hurts you in the market. There was a high
level of respect for that in our case—both on our part
and on the part of EFP Group and the investment banking firm."
NBT Bancorp, Judd says, took notice. "They've said
that they felt they were treated extremely well throughout
the process and the negotiation. They felt the relationship
and the discussion were amicable."
"These deals consist of people, not numbers," says
EFP's Camarella. "We begin these processes with a deep
understanding of our clients' personal as well as financial
objectives, and we keep both considerations at the forefront
all the way through."
Contact to discuss how we can create synergy
in your merger or acquisition.
|
|

"We felt that
EFP, as our accounting firm, was already familiar with
our business, and would be the best people to get it
done. We were right."
—Bob Judd, EPIC Advisors
"For most small business
owners, their business is the most sizeable asset they
own. They get one shot at selling it. A professional
comes with the experience of hundreds of sales. We
take the emotion and stress out of the deal so you
can focus on the big decisions, not the process."
—Lou Camarella, EFP Group
"Everybody walked
away saying this was a good thing."
—Bob Judd, EPIC Advisors
Contact
to discuss
how we can create synergy in your merger or acquisition.
|
|